In a significant revelation, the House Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government has disclosed that federal agencies flagged financial transactions using terms like "MAGA" and "TRUMP". This news has stirred discussions about privacy rights and the extent of government surveillance.

The flagged transactions are suspected to include seemingly innocuous activities such as purchasing items. According to documents obtained by the Subcommittee, these terms were used as markers for banks to comb through customer data.

This discovery has raised concerns over potential political bias in the flagging process. Critics argue that singling out transactions based on politically affiliated keywords could potentially infringe upon individual privacy rights and constitute an unfair targeting of particular political groups.

The Subcommittee's findings have opened a new chapter in the ongoing debate about the role of the federal government in monitoring financial transactions. Some argue that such measures are necessary to prevent illegal activities and maintain national security. Others, however, see it as a dangerous overreach that could lead to unwarranted invasions of privacy.

The federal government has yet to respond to these allegations. As this story develops, it remains to be seen how these revelations will impact the public's perception of government surveillance and the protection of individual privacy