top of page

Social Media Firms Are Threatening Free Speech With “Disinformation” Claims, Sunak Says

In recent years, concerns over social media censorship and the suppression of free speech have reached alarming levels. A group of 136 academics, historians, and journalists, including influential figures like John Cleese, Jordan Peterson, and Julian Assange, have warned Chancellor Rishi Sunak about the misuse of "disinformation" claims to silence legitimate opinions. They argue that social networks, government officials, universities, and NGOs are labeling protected speech as fake news in an attempt to control the narrative. This article discusses the rise of social media censorship, its implications for free speech, and the potential erosion of democratic norms.

The Counter Disinformation Unit: Flagging Criticism of Lockdown

A secretive government unit known as the Counter Disinformation Unit was exposed for flagging criticism of lockdown as Covid "disinformation". Operating out of Whitehall and collaborating with intelligence agencies, this unit monitored the online posts of journalists and the public. The unit's actions have raised concerns among the signatories of the "Westminster Declaration," who argue that terms like "disinformation" and "misinformation" are being abused to stifle dissenting voices.

The Westminster Declaration: Defending Free Speech

The signatories of the Westminster Declaration express deep concerns about the attempts to label protected speech as fake news and the misuse of ill-defined terms such as "misinformation" and "malinformation". They argue that unpopular opinions and ideas have often become conventional wisdom over time, and free speech is necessary to challenge false paradigms and expand knowledge. The signatories stress that free speech is the cornerstone of democracy, allowing for open discourse, government accountability, and the empowerment of marginalized groups.

Examples of Censorship and Suppression

Several individuals who co-signed the Westminster Declaration have firsthand experience with social media censorship. Prominent journalists Julia Hartley-Brewer and Peter Hitchens, along with free speech activist Toby Young, were flagged for Covid disinformation by government units. Hartley-Brewer was referred over a conversation about vaccine passports, while Hitchens shared an article questioning the completeness of data used to justify lockdown measures. These cases highlight the real-world consequences of social media censorship on public debate.

Increasing International Censorship

The signatories of the Westminster Declaration also raise concerns about increasing international censorship, which poses a threat to democratic norms. They identify visibility filtering, labeling, and manipulation of search engine results, as well as deplatforming and flagging of controversial content, as tools used to silence lawful opinions on national and geopolitical issues. The group includes notable figures like Richard Dawkins, Robert Tombs, and Edward Snowden, who warn of the erosion of centuries-old democratic principles.

Upholding Open Discourse: The Pillar of a Free Society

Open discourse is essential for a free society. The Westminster Declaration emphasizes that while words may sometimes cause offense, hurt feelings and discomfort should not be grounds for censorship. They argue that open forums for dissent have been crucial in advancing equality and justice throughout history. The suppression of valid discussions on matters of public interest undermines the principles of representative democracy and limits the ability to hold governments accountable.

Threats to Free Speech: Online Safety Bill and Encrypted Messages

The Westminster Declaration also highlights other measures that threaten free speech, such as the Online Safety Bill and proposed end-to-end encryption of private messages on platforms like WhatsApp. While the Online Safety Bill aims to protect individuals from harmful content on the internet, there are concerns that it may have a chilling effect on public debate. The potential opening of encrypted messages raises further worries about privacy and freedom of expression.

6 views0 comments
bottom of page